Treatment evidence in general practice (demonstration)
1Choose what to carryThe organisations whose guidance you want with you
2Add Relay to your assistantOne link, added once to the assistant you use
3Ask as you normally wouldWhen it applies, the guidance comes with the answer
A demonstration of what a body that publishes quantitative treatment evidence looks like from inside an AI assistant: the absolute benefits and harms of a treatment, what the numbers do not tell you, and the clinician who still has to make the decision. Built by Humanity Incorporated. It publishes no figures of its own.
This is a demonstration built by Humanity Incorporated. No clinician, professional body or evidence publisher has written, reviewed or approved any of it, and it carries no clinical authority. It is modelled on the way point-of-care evidence resources present absolute benefits and harms, and it contains no figure taken from any of them. It cannot tell anyone whether to start, continue or stop a treatment. That decision rests with the clinician responsible for the patient's care, with the patient, and with the published evidence itself.
What this adds
Once Relay is in your assistant, it can consult this guidance when you ask about something
it covers, and the answer comes back with the source, where the guidance stops, and who to
speak to. It does not replace judgement, procedures or responsible people.
Topics covered
Treatment evidenceAbsolute riskNumber needed to treatShared decision makingDeprescribingEvidence quality
What is in it (1 document)
Reading the benefits and harms of a treatment (DEMO)DEMO 2026AdvisoryOur wording, check the source
What Relay does not do
It does not decide your case or certify compliance.
It does not replace your responsible people or local procedures.
It does not ask for, or store, personal or case details.